Abstract
Cattle production plays a significant role in terms of world food production. Nearly 82% of the world’s 1.2 billion cattle can be found in developing countries. An increasing demand for meat in developing countries has seen an increase in intensification of animal industries, and a move to cross-bred animals. Heat tolerance is considered to be one of the most important adaptive aspects for cattle, and the lack of thermally-tolerant breeds is a major constraint on cattle production in many countries. There is a need to not only identify heat tolerant breeds, but also heat tolerant animals within a non-tolerant breed. Identification of heat tolerant animals is not easy under field conditions. In this study, panting score (0 to 4.5 scale where 0 = no stress and 4.5 = extreme stress) and the heat load index (HLI) [HLIBG<25°C = 10.66 + 0.28 × rh + 1.30 × BG – WS; and, HLI BG> 25°C = 8.62 + 0.38 × rh + 1.55 × BG – 0.5 × WS + e(2.4 – WS), where BG = black globe temperature (oC), rh = relative humidity (decimal form), WS = wind speed (m/s) and e is the base of the natural logarithm] were used to assess the heat tolerance of 17 genotypes (12,757 steers) within 13 Australian feedlots over three summers. The cattle were assessed under natural climatic conditions in which HLI ranged from thermonuetral (HLI < 70) to extreme (HLI > 96; black globe temperature = 40.2°C, relative humidity = 64%, wind speed = 1.58 m/s). When HLI > 96 a greater number (P < 0.001) of pure bred Bos taurus and crosses of Bos taurus cattle had a panting score ≥ 2 compared to Brahman cattle, and Brahman-cross cattle. The heat tolerance of the assessed breeds was verified using panting scores and the HLI. Heat tolerance of cattle can be assessed under field conditions by using panting score and HLI.

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bianca W (1961) Heat tolerance in cattle-its concept, measurement and dependence on modifying factors. Int J Biometeorol 1:5–30. doi:10.1007/BF02186917
Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2005) Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 1: Analyses of indicators. J Biosys Eng 90:451–462. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.12.006
Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Eigenberg RA, Mader TL, Morrow JL, Dailey JW (2006) Comparison of heat tolerance of feedlot heifers of different breeds. Livest Sci 105:19–26. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.012
Chase CC Jr, Riley DG, Olson TA, Coleman SW, Hammond AC AC (2004) Maternal and reproductive performance of Brahman × Angus, Senepol × Angus, and Tuli × Angus cows in the subtropics. J Anim Sci 82:2764–2772
Clarke MR, Kelly AM (1996) Some effects of shade on Hereford steers in a feedlot. Anim Prod Aus 21:235–238
FAO (2006) http://www.fao.org/climatechange/49537/en/
Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM, Josey MJ, Rowan KJ (1999) Heat tolerance of Boran and Tuli crossbred steers. J Anim Sci 77:23986–2405
Gaughan JB, Mader TL, Holt SM (2008) A new heat load index for feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 86:226–234. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0305
Hahn GL (1999) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J Anim Sci 77:10–20
Hahn GL, Mader TL (1997) Heat waves in relation to thermoregulation, feeding behaviour and mortality of feedlot cattle. Proceedings of the 5th International Livestock Environment Symposium, Bloomington, MN, pp 563–571
Hammond AC, Chase CC Jr, Bowers EJ, Olson TA, Randel RD (1998) Heat tolerance in Tuli-, Senepol-, and Brahman-sired F1 Angus heifers in Florida. J Anim Sci 76:1568–1577
Hoffmann I, Beate S (2006) Animal genetic resources - time to worry? In: Livestock Report 2006. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. pp 57–76
Hungerford LL, Buhman MJ, Dewell RD, Mader TL, Griffin D, Smith DR, Nienaber JA (2000) Investigation of heat stress mortality in four midwest feedlots. Proceedings of International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, 616, Breckenridge, CO, USA
McManus C, Prescott E, Paludo GR, Bianchini E (2009) Heat tolerance in naturalized Brazilian cattle breeds. Livest Sci 120:256–264. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.014
Mader TL, Fell LR, McPhee MJ (1997) Behavior response of non-Brahman cattle to shade in commercial feedlots. Proceedings of the 5th Livestock Environment International Symposium, Bloomington, MN, USA, pp 795–802
Mader TL, Davis MS, Brown-Brandl T (2006) Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 84:712–719
Mitlöhner FM, Morrow JL, Daily DW, Wilson SC, Galyean ML, Miller MF, McGlone JJ (2001) Shade and water misting effects on behaviour, physiology, performance, and carcass traits of heat-stressed feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 79:2327–2335
Rosenzweig C, Casassa G, Karoly DJ, Imeson A, Liu C, Menzel A, Rawlins S, Root TL, Seguin B, Tryjanowski P (2007) Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 79–13
Sackett D, Holmes P, Abbott K, Jephcott S, Barber B (2006) Assessing the economic cost of endemic disease on the profitability of Australian beef cattle and sheep producers-Final Report AHW.087. Meat and Livestock Australia Limited, Nth Sydney NSW 2059
St-Pierre NR, Cobanov B, Schnitkey G (2003) Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. J Dairy Sci 86(E Suppl):E52–E77
Thornton P, Herrero M, Freeman A, Mwai O, Rege E, Jones P, McDermott J (2007) Vulnerability, climate change and livestock - research opportunities and challenges for poverty alleviation. SAT eJournal | ejournal.icrisat.org 4:1–23
Tisdell C (2003) Socioeconomic causes of loss of animal genetic diversity: analysis and assessment. Ecol Econ 45:365–377. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00091-0
Voh AA Jr, Larbi A, Olorunju SAS, Agyemang K, Abiola BD, Williams TO (2004) Fertility of N’dama and Bunaji cattle to artificial insemination following oestrus synchronization with PRID and PGF2α in the hot humid zone of Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod 36:499–511. doi:10.1023/B:TROP.0000035007.19522.62
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by Meat Livestock Australia P/L, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Thanks to Mr Allan Lisle for statistical analysis, Mr Robert Englebright and Mr Ian Williams for their technical support. A special thanks to the management and staff of the feedlots who participated in the studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaughan, J.B., Mader, T.L., Holt, S.M. et al. Assessing the heat tolerance of 17 beef cattle genotypes. Int J Biometeorol 54, 617–627 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0233-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-009-0233-4