Add missing word; Consistent capitalization (#722)

dhurlburtusa · web-flow · commit 091b325c6999 · 2024-07-13T12:50:46.000+02:00
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
@@ -189,10 +189,10 @@ type AppProps = {
 // Easiest way to declare a Function Component; return type is inferred.
 const App = ({ message }: AppProps) => <div>{message}</div>;
 
-// you can choose annotate the return type so an error is raised if you accidentally return some other type
+// You can choose to annotate the return type so an error is raised if you accidentally return some other type
 const App = ({ message }: AppProps): React.JSX.Element => <div>{message}</div>;
 
-// you can also inline the type declaration; eliminates naming the prop types, but looks repetitive
+// You can also inline the type declaration; eliminates naming the prop types, but looks repetitive
 const App = ({ message }: { message: string }) => <div>{message}</div>;
 
 // Alternatively, you can use `React.FunctionComponent` (or `React.FC`), if you prefer.
diff --git a/docs/basic/getting-started/function-components.md b/docs/basic/getting-started/function-components.md
@@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ type AppProps = {
 // Easiest way to declare a Function Component; return type is inferred.
 const App = ({ message }: AppProps) => <div>{message}</div>;
 
-// you can choose annotate the return type so an error is raised if you accidentally return some other type
+// You can choose to annotate the return type so an error is raised if you accidentally return some other type
 const App = ({ message }: AppProps): React.JSX.Element => <div>{message}</div>;
 
-// you can also inline the type declaration; eliminates naming the prop types, but looks repetitive
+// You can also inline the type declaration; eliminates naming the prop types, but looks repetitive
 const App = ({ message }: { message: string }) => <div>{message}</div>;
 
 // Alternatively, you can use `React.FunctionComponent` (or `React.FC`), if you prefer.
